Skip to content

chore(jenkins): Updates Jenkins plugins #355

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2025
Merged

chore(jenkins): Updates Jenkins plugins #355

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

@gounthar
Copy link
Owner

@gounthar gounthar commented Jan 30, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

This pull request updates the Jenkins plugins listed in plugins.txt.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated multiple Jenkins plugin versions, including:
      • Configuration as Code
      • Matrix Auth
      • SSH API plugins
      • Pipeline-related plugins
      • Workflow-related plugins
    • Version increments across various plugins to potentially improve system stability and functionality

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 30, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

This pull request involves updating the versions of multiple Jenkins plugins in the dockerfiles/plugins.txt file. The changes include version increments for various plugins across different categories such as configuration, authentication, SSH API, pipeline-related plugins, workflow plugins, and others. These updates likely represent bug fixes, security patches, or minor improvements to the respective Jenkins plugins.

Changes

File Change Summary
dockerfiles/plugins.txt - Updated configuration-as-code from 1915.vcdd0a_d0d2625 to 1929.v036b_5a_e1f123
- Updated matrix-auth from 3.2.3 to 3.2.4
- Updated mina-sshd-api-common and mina-sshd-api-core from 2.14.0-138.v6341ee58e1df to 2.14.0-143.v2b_362fc39576
- Updated pipeline-build-step from 540.vb_e8849e1a_b_d8 to 551.v178956c49ef8
- Updated multiple pipeline-model-* plugins from 2.2218.v56d0cda_37c72 to 2.2221.vc657003fb_d93
- Updated variant from 60.v7290fc0eb_b_cd to 70.va_d9f17f859e0
- Updated various workflow-* plugins with version increments

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

repo

Poem

🐰 Plugins dancing, versions bright,
Updating Jenkins with all my might!
From SSH to workflow's embrace,
Each number finds its perfect place.
A rabbit's code, a version's flight! 🚀

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 80ab2a5 and 7cb6d2f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • dockerfiles/plugins.txt (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
dockerfiles/plugins.txt

42-42: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

43-43: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

44-44: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

51-51: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

80-80: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Security Scan
🔇 Additional comments (6)
dockerfiles/plugins.txt (6)

42-43: Verify SSH functionality after mina-sshd-api updates.

Both SSH API plugins have been updated to patch version 2.14.0-143. Since these are core SSH components, please ensure:

  1. SSH agent connectivity still works
  2. SSH-based SCM operations function correctly
  3. SSH build agents can connect properly
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)

42-42: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

43-43: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

71-71: Review major version update of variant plugin.

The variant plugin has been updated from version 60 to 70. As this is a major version increment and the plugin provides core functionality for Jenkins plugin development, please:

  1. Check the changelog for any breaking changes
  2. Test plugin compatibility thoroughly

42-43: Dismiss false positive security alerts.

The static analysis tool (Gitleaks) has flagged several plugin version numbers as potential API keys. These are false positives as they follow Jenkins' standard versioning scheme (e.g., 2.14.0-143.v2b_362fc39576).

Also applies to: 44-44, 51-51, 80-80

🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)

42-42: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

43-43: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

45-45: Verify pipeline functionality with updated plugins.

Multiple pipeline plugins have been updated:

  • pipeline-build-step to 551.v178956c49ef8
  • All pipeline-model-* plugins to 2.2221.vc657003fb_d93

Since these are core pipeline components, please ensure:

  1. Declarative pipelines still work
  2. Pipeline build steps execute correctly
  3. Pipeline visualization remains functional

Also applies to: 51-53, 56-56

13-13: Verify Jenkins core compatibility with updated configuration plugins.

The updates to configuration-as-code and matrix-auth are minor version increments. Please ensure these versions are compatible with your Jenkins core version.

Also applies to: 39-39

73-76: Verify workflow functionality after significant updates.

Multiple workflow plugins have been updated, with workflow-basic-steps having a significant version jump from 1058 to 1079. Please verify:

  1. Basic pipeline steps (echo, sh, etc.) work correctly
  2. Multibranch pipeline functionality
  3. Pipeline script compilation (workflow-cps)
  4. Long-running steps execute properly

Also applies to: 78-78, 80-80

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the repo label Jan 30, 2025
@gounthar gounthar merged commit 1ee665d into main Jan 30, 2025
24 checks passed
@gounthar gounthar deleted the update-plugins-2025/01/30/08/11/29 branch January 30, 2025 09:11
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 11, 2025
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

repo

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@gounthar